 |
| Peter Quennell |
Peter Quennell responded to the article linked above with an outright
lie by posting the following comment today on Peggy Ganong's website, perugiamurderfile.org.
"There is much missing from those emails on her side and nothing from what continued on Facebook. Several are fabricated and not written by me."
It is laughable to think that any of these emails were ever
fabricated. Every email posted in the article linked above that was
attributed to Peter Quennell was written by him and he very well knows
this. If he needs to be reminded about exactly what he said, I can send
all of the emails to him and his wife so that he can refresh his memory
while trying to explain away his wrongdoing. He knows what he did was
wrong. He complied with detectives when they told him to take the
unauthorized website offline for that very reason. As far as the rest of
Quennell’s statement above, the article clearly states that Quennell
sent hundreds of emails to Jane. Jane’s privacy is of great concern. The
entire conversation is not necessary to show Quennell’s reprehensible
behavior. Nothing Jane said to Quennell warranted the emails she
received in return.
Quennell added another post on Perugia Murder File stating that he was
"still standing" as if he had scored a great victory from a vicious
attack, displaying no remorse for his actions and explained away his
repulsive behavior by discussing how great he is.
As expected, a few of Quennell’s loyal followers rushed to voice
support. Most comments have been nothing more than baseless attacks on
me and have completely ignored Quennell's behavior. Quennell’s behavior
is embarrassing and unacceptable, so I understand the need for
Quennell’s supporters to be in denial. However, to any reasonable
person, these emails expose Quennell for what he really is.
Peggy Ganong, one of Quennell’s biggest fans, was quick to show her
support. She accused me (once again) of defamation in a post on her
website. This is no surprise of course, and her response further proves
the point I have repeatedly made regarding her group’s battle cry to
accuse others of defamation in order to distract people from the truth.
Ganong has accused me of several things in the past, none of which
have been true. I have been hilariously referred to as a “paid employee”
of the David Marriot PR Firm and she also loves to boldly claim that I
use a "fake" name. Both of which are completely false. At one point,
Peggy’s website was so obsessed with me, they even posted a picture of
the United States showing where all the Bruce Fishers in the country
resided. For months, both Peter Quennell and Peggy Ganong perpetuated a
myth that I was a cameraman in Seattle, all stemming from a bad guess
based on another Bruce Fisher's Linked-In profile.
Peggy Ganong in particular has become obsessed with finding out as
many facts about me as possible. In fact, now she has become so
obsessed with me, she is using my name as her avatar on the forum she
moderates---something I find simultaneously humorous and creepy at the
same time.
Of course, I realize Peggy Ganong would love for me to post my home
address online so her group of loyal followers could harass my family
and send hate mail to my employer, but I think I will have to decline to
fulfill her wishes for the time being. Peggy need not worry about
unearthing anything spectacular about myself. I am just an average guy,
and I can promise that I have never stalked and harassed a woman as
Peggy Ganong’s friend Peter Quennell has done.
I am rarely shocked by anything I read on Peggy Ganong's website but
today I was actually a little surprised at the indecency. Instead of
distancing herself from Peter Quennell’s harassment of an innocent young
woman, Ganong instead chose to blame and attack Quennell’s victim,
insinuating that she is hiding behind a pseudonym and acting immorally
in order to run an online smear campaign against Quennell. (As an
aside, Peggy should understand that it is in fact people like her who
prevent people who have been victimized from speaking out in the first
place. How can she then complain about anonymity?)
Here is the exact quote she used:
“"Jane" and "Bruce" have violated one of the basic underlying rules of netiquette. Having done so, one apparently now wants to hide behind a "Jane Doe" moniker, while the other has always hidden, maintaining his status as a virtual non-entity who has been hired to run an online smear campaign as part of his job description. Whatever else happens, "Jane" has shown herself to be someone who has no qualms about taking someone's money and then not living up to her end of the moral agreement”
The fact that this young woman wants to protect her privacy needs no
explanation. Peggy Ganong's comments regarding this young woman are
shameful, but not surprising. At this point, Peggy Ganong’s shameful
behavior is what we’ve come to expect.
One last note: I recently posted an article discussing a teacher and his students that created a video in support of Amanda Knox. Due to a relentless attack on their school, orchestrated by members of the group led by Peggy Ganong and Peter Quennell, I made the decision to remove the article from the internet. The article was not removed because of issues with content; it was removed because I felt that it was unfair for the school to have to deal with the harassment. Even if an employer supports an employee 100%, it does not mean the employer should be expected to take on a cause that the employee believes in.
One last note: I recently posted an article discussing a teacher and his students that created a video in support of Amanda Knox. Due to a relentless attack on their school, orchestrated by members of the group led by Peggy Ganong and Peter Quennell, I made the decision to remove the article from the internet. The article was not removed because of issues with content; it was removed because I felt that it was unfair for the school to have to deal with the harassment. Even if an employer supports an employee 100%, it does not mean the employer should be expected to take on a cause that the employee believes in.
Thankfully thousands were able to read the inspiring story during the
time it was online. If those who are currently attacking supporters of
Amanda Knox (in a blatant attempt to harm their lives) ever decide to
refrain from this repulsive behavior, the article discussing the class
project completed by the teacher and his students can then be put back
online. It is a shame that innocent people are being attacked for simply
believing in the innocence of Amanda Knox.
